Wednesday, February 12, 2014

TR-3


Aurora Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Hendrickson
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0)
There is nothing more fascinating in the aviation world than the “black projects” – aircraft programs that are so secret that even those with the highest security clearance may have no idea they exist.  But occasionally the veil of secrecy is accidentally lifted – or projects are declassified – offering a fleeting glimpse into this shadowy world.  Here we take to the air with six different planes – some now released into the public domain, others still highly classified or even non-existent.
TR-3A Black Manta
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images by Adrian Mann
Allegedly active during the 1980s and ’90s, little is known of the TR-3A Black Manta beyond rumour and hearsay.  Popularly embraced as a subsonic stealth aircraft manufactured by Northrop Grumman (famed for its “flying wing” designs), the TR-3A was rumoured to have been used in the Gulf War in conjunction with F-117A stealth fighters, but little evidence exists to support this.  Another theory – again unsubstantiated – holds that the vehicle identified as the TR-3 was a prototype for the B-2 Spirit.
TR 3A Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist(Image: Area51ZONE.com)
Two 1977 designs from Teledyne Ryan, a firm specialising in unmanned aerial vehicles, have been linked to the TR-3A.  This stems in part from the fact that “TR” stands for Teledyne Ryan – a fanciful connection considering “TR” is well known to denote “tactical reconnaissance.  Teledyne Ryan was purchased by Northrop Grumman in 1999, adding fuel to the fire of conspiracy theory.  But aside from a patent (below) that is said to resemble the configuration of whatever aircraft has been identified with the TR-3A, there is little, if any, credible evidence linking it to Teledyne Ryan.
The designation “TR-3″ likely came about due to confusion with another black project, Tier III, which led to the RQ-3 Darkstar.  Another theory holds that the aircraft dubbed the TR-3 may have grown out of the Tactical High Altitude Penetrator (THAP) studies, of which little exists in the public domain.  This article discusses THAP’s potential mission as a recon-strike platform, which could account for a plethora of sightings throughout the 1980s and ’90s.  However, there is significant debate over whether THAP progressed to the flight testing stage.  If THAP was not responsible for the “TR-3A” sightings, it’s possible another secret demonstrator associated with the A-12 Avenger programme (below) could have been…
Flying Triangle dubbed “TR-3B”
The online world is buzzing with information about the alleged “TR-3B“, from rumours of its fantastical capabilities to intriguing video footage.  Yet despite numerous sightings suggesting the existence of a large triangular aircraft that can fly slowly and quietly, little information exists about this rumoured black project. Like the TR-3A above, the designation “TR-3B” is almost certainly a misnomer.
The most dramatic claims frame the “TR-3B” as a nuclear powered tactical reconnaissance aircraft capable of disrupting gravity.  But a more likely – and in many ways more interesting – argument for these strange flying triangles, is that they’re lighter-than-air vehicles or some sort of stealthy troop transport aircraft.  Given the technologies proven by Have Blue and Tacit Blue in the 1970s and ’80s and the number of projects that have allegedly been tested at Groom Lake since that time, it’s not impossible to think that some of these flying triangle reports may have some substance to them, if not under the designation TR-3B.
A-12 Avenger II (and the Mysterious Jet that May Have Preceeded it)
A 12 Avenger II Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via U.S. Navy
The A-12 Avenger II was envisioned by McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics as an all-weather, carrier-based stealth bomber for the U.S. Navy and Marines.  Shrowded in secrecy at the time of development in 1983, the A-12 reportedly gained the nickname “Flying Dorito”.  Concept drawings and mock-ups show a flying wing design in the shape of an isosceles triangle, with the cockpit near the apex.
A 12 Avenger II 2 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image by Anynobody
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0)
Development of the A-12 was hampered by problems.  The project was cancelled in January 1991 by then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney when the estimated price of each plane allegedly hit $165 million.  The cancellation was said to be a breach of contract, resulting in years of legal wrangling.  In 2009, a court finally ruled in favour of the government and ordered the contractors to pay more than a $2 billion in charges, but the battle ranges on to this day.
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images via U.S. Navy
After the cancellation of the A-12 Avenger II the Navy purchased the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.  While there was never a full scale prototype, an earlier (1976 – 1984) classified General Dynamics technology demonstrator called Model 100 (funded under the Have Key program) may have paved the way for the cancelled A-12.  It has been suggested that this aircraft remains secret due to the ongoing legal issues.  The A-12 has also been linked to a secret plane called Sneaky Pete, which may or may not be the Model 100, or a development thereof.  We were able to locate one A-12 mock-up thanks to those savvy online explorers at Virtual Globetrotting.
X-44 Manta
X 44 Manta Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via strange-mecha.com
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported)
The X-44 Manta was a conceptual design by Lockheed Martin, based on the original F-22 Raptor (below).  The X-44 was essentially a tailless Raptor with large delta wing and advanced thrust vectoring nozzles replacing normal aerodynamic control surfaces.  Benefits would be a more stealthy, light airframe, with increased fuel volume and maneuverability.  The plan was to convert an early F-22 prototype but the program was allegedly terminated in 2000.  The X-44 render looks similar to the proposed FB-22, reportedly cancelled in 2006.
F 22 Raptor Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Rob Shenk
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic)
It’s hard to know what to make of many alleged black projects.  Could some of these exotic aircraft be one and the same?  How much disinformation is out there?  The X-44 was essentially a flying wing design with a name similar to the TR-3A “Black Manta”, although in the X-44′s case, MANTA apparently denoted Multi-Axis No-Tail Aircraft.  Could this be a case of one black project’s name being mistakenly attributed to another, like TR-3 and Tier III?  In 2005, GlobalSecurity.org reported that the X-44 designation may be reserved for a possible NASA full-scale manned tailless flight control demonstrator.
HALO (High Altitude Low Observability) / BAE Replica
BAE Replica1 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist(Image: Stridus, public domain)
Like other black projects, Britain’s effort to create a stealth demonstrator remains shadowy, despite cancellation in the 1990s.  The Replica program was a BAE Systems design study tied in with the RAF’s now defunct Future Offensive Air System (FOAS).  It is known to have run from 1994 to 1999, with a full-sized mock-up subjected to rigorous testing to determine its radar cross section (above).
JSF Proposal Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Planeman
FOAS set out to replace the RAF’s Tornado GR4 jets with a range of manned and unmanned platforms by 2017.  The program was cancelled in June 2005 after the UK joined the U.S. Joint-Unmanned Combat Air System (J-UCAS) program, which was itself cancelled the next year but later revived as the Navy-only UCAS-D program.  After the termination of FOAS, knowledge gained from Replica was poured into the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF).
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images via United States Air Force
Initial arguments over Britain’s access to the JSF source code prompted Britain to consider a potential alternative.  While likely referring to an adapted Eurofighter Typhoon, Replica remains in the shadows, despite public acknowledgement of the program and photos of the full scale mock-up stored at BAE Warton.  This could be due to the ongoing use of Replica’s technology in forthcoming projects, such as the JSF, but also Taranis, a BAE unmanned demonstrator.  Again publicly acknowledged, Taranis is set to fly next year although sightings suggest it – or perhaps something else – flew in 2009, which the British government vehemently denies.
Aurora – Hypersonic Spyplane
Aurora 2 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Hendrickson and Foxbat
(Image licensed under Creative Commons Attirbution-ShareAlike 3.0)
The Aurora spyplane is the world’s most famous top secret aircraft, and a reliable photograph would be one of the most coveted finds in the history of classified aviation.  Historically presented as a hypersonic replacement for the ageing SR-71 Blackbird spyplane (below), there’s considerable evidence available in the public domain to suggest no specific aircraft called “Aurora” ever existed.
SR 71 Blackbird Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
SR-71 Blackbird (image via U.S. Air Force)
The name “Aurora” reportedly slipped out in the 1985 US budget alongside an allocation of $455 million for “black aircraft production”.  Excited journalists, writing in the March 1990 edition of Aviation Week & Space Technology, linked “Aurora” to the reported black aircraft, and later to a family of exotic aviation projects, claiming that by 1987 funding had reached $2.3 billion.  Ben Rich, former director of the Lockheed Skunk Works (which built the F-117, below), said there never was a hypersonic Blackbird follow-on and claimed Aurora was the name given to the B-2 Stealth Bomber competition funding.
F 117 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
F-117 Nighthawk (image by U.S. Air Force)
Helping to fuel the Aurora legend was a disjointed catalogue of sightings and mysterious sonic booms.  The most compelling sighting came in August 1989, when Chris Gibson, an engineer aboard the Galveston Key rig in the North Sea, observed a strange isosceles triangle-shaped aircraft refuelling from a KC-135 Stratotanker, escorted by two F-111 bombers.  Gibson, a member of the Royal Observer Corps and trained aircraft recognition expert, could not identify the mysterious plane.
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Image via Google Earth
In the early 1990s, the disclosed “Aurora” designation and the “North Sea sighting” were linked to several other reports that helped perpetuate the story of a top secret SR-71 follow-on.  One was a report of an aircraft over Amarillo, Texas, with an engine described as emitting a “strange, loud pulsating roar”.  Caught on film was an alleged “donuts-on-a-rope” contrail that has become synonymous with the Aurora myth.  While some attribute this to a potential pulse wave detonation engine, others have argued the contrails could have been made by ordinary jet aircraft.
 Top Secret Aircraft that Officially Do/Did Not Exist
Images via Google Earth
Finally, a series of bizarre sonic booms heard over California up until 1993 were attributed to Aurora after seismologists concluded they did not characterise earthquakes, but indictated “something at 90,000 feet, Mach 4 to Mach 5.2″.  Intriguingly, each unexplained sonic boom came on a Thursday morning between 6 and 7am.  In addition, Groom Lake (Area 51) has a six mile long runway, now closed, that some say would be a requirement for testing a high speed, mach 5 plus, aircraft.
It’s telling that, more than 20 years after Aurora debuted in aviation and popular science publications, no solid evidence has been found to support its existence, despite the hype and hordes of investigators digging for information.  At this point it seems likely that the top secret aircraft known as Aurora stems from sightings of various aircraft (some potentially black projects) and not necessarily a single airframe.  That said, Chris Gibson’s sighting and the strange skyquakes remain a mystery to this day.
If you enjoyed this article, explore more urban ghosts within our archives. You can also subscribe to our feed, become our friend


Darren Perks
UFO Investigative Researcher and Media Contributor

UFO: Flying Triangles


Posted: 29/09/2012

There are thousands of UFO sightings around the world every year, but a high percentage of them relate to one very common UFO and shape....

Strange flying black triangle UFOs


[image]
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyBqYOdkZKKAL_n8hwpv8XZNspDlqkFNF_TBsGUaKE-Twp2vOm7cEZDDkJgZZVkrNNiF6Zv2-QgpNpoqrO3zp0clNtfdES-Q8DCNmlzjjhqh_mueLGN-bo1QQKGLL0tjeR9T2u-6ip-hE/s1600/belgium_triangle_ufo.jpg


I myself witnessed one on 30 March 1993, which was part of the famous UK Cosford UFO incident, and I became one of thousands of people who have witnessed these strange craft in our skies.

Read more about the Cosford UFO incident here: Cosford UFO

But what are they?

They are large, triangular-shaped UFOs, often black in colour, with rounded corners and making a low, humming noise. They disappear to the horizon at unbelievable speed. They are ususally big craft and show up from nowhere in the blink of an eye.

The first sighting of these mystery triangles was recorded and reported in 1965. Some say they were first sighted in 1950s. For some time people have said they are secret military projects - the next generation stealth aircrafts. But why are they flying the same way since sixties. How come the technology never changed in more than 50 years?

According to many ufologists like myself, these UFOs are the outcome of direct transfer of technologies from extraterrestrials to human civilization in different parts of the world. They are believed to be reverse engineered from crashed UFOs, and have been developed behind closed doors at top secret military facilities and bases around the world. One such facility is Groom Lake aka Area 51 in Nevada USA: AREA 51

The triangle shaped UFOs are said to use anti-gravity propulsion. They also use superconductors to create the electromagnetic flux as well as anti-gravity propulsion. That is why the humming noise comes out which was heard by myself and many others. What I witnessed on 30th March 1993 was very real indeed and is still unexplained along with other flying triangle incidnets. But we have to consider the possibility that it may not just be Extra-Terrestrail UFOs, but craft developed by us from their technology...

Some laugh at this theory and just asume people who see these triangles are seeing illusions. But when have you heard and invetsigated people seeing exactly the same thing or 'illusion' (from a sceptics point of view) in places tens of thousands of miles apart, it cannot be and illusion or something just made up in the mind.

Read more: http://theedgeofreality.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=ufos&action=display&thread=2819#ixzz2BSwx6C9zhttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgA2sLpWUbiZ_ROeV7wytsEObh7cozU4045GUEpOpvyZeg0pafBJWMohDp2Ulo9dJfQRkyGpOg4pjtr0m910AZ13A_MjqIdCR_He8wARh0aaUgLz9q8P6WXEdf-UIlX_jVrgc1imzQQpfg/s1600/sb8.jpghttp://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQNsKMWrPRXb1MYALWcJJQGgKnd_hYgM5VamIJciR9bsW5YLaFpoi3aqd7D
http://www.ufocasebook.com/newhampshire2003.jpghttp://www.angelfire.com/ca/air51am/images/a17.gif
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/TriangleBelgium1990.jpg/310px-TriangleBelgium1990.jpghttp://rense.com/1.imagesA/Manta.jpghttp://maxrushtv.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/265817_f520.jpghttp://www.spaceworld2000.com/web.jpg/aurora2.jpg
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEieqngXK1NdT6HH7NPh0ysK5LNAwAPAM2vaO9D5tWvr-u6yLAaCnZF6XcS_Bx80QrjUd1j3ic8m83bFu58z7Chyphenhyphenvmd-W9RtSzyN21pzwo6lV-r4lwYJXI7sKUyEElLP49XI9gV-yHUQclnc/s1600/UFO,+UFOs,+sighting,+Bob,+Robert,+Lazar,+sighting,+sightings,+report,+MUFON,+mj12,+alien,+aliens,+ET,+space,+odd,+strange,+area+51,+area+s4,+Top+secret,+confidential21.+Triangle+UFO+on+hill.tif
http://www.urbanghostsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/boeing-bird-of-prey-demonstrator.jpghttp://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=10312&d=1317964310&thumb=1
http://images.auctionhelper.com/images/10343/Anigrand/AnigrandSR71e.jpghttp://www.ovni.ch/~kouros/images/aurorph2.jpghttp://fc05.deviantart.net/fs36/f/2008/253/e/9/Lockheed_SR_91_Aurora_by_bagera3005.png


Pennsylvania Lights
GAP -- Last night, July 29th, 2012. I was traveling eastbound on US Route 30. I was driving when I saw 6-7 large "fireballs" traveling towards me. I knew pretty quickly these were not airplanes, due to how they were grouped together and I have been in this area for 12 years and I am accustomed to the airplanes that travel in this area. They were a bright burning red color that was constant that did not dim or flash.
I pulled over on the side of the road and began filming with my IPhone 4GS. The first four were traveling in two pairs and the others were traveling in singles behind. The objects started to align in a triangle, then a straight line before disappearing. Thanks to MUFON CMS
Texas Triangle
SHAMROCK -- I put Travis County and Austin in the location fields of the form at the request of the field investigator (Robert Powell). A friend who attended college picked me up on November 20, 2000. It was at dusk near I-40 when I noticed the object moving northeast. As we got within two miles it was crossing the highway ahead of us, and we could tell that it was moving very slowly.
We saw it was not a conventional aircraft, and had blue lights at each point of the triangle. The lights were steadily glowing as it flew by at 35 mph, at 1,000 feet in altitude. We had never seen anything like it before. It was probably 400 yards across at least. Other people in cars were standing outside watching. We eventually lost sight of it. I found this picture that is similar but the object we saw was much larger. Thanks to MUFON CMS
Utah Cylinder

SALT LAKE CITY – Mothership videotaped over city on July 13, 2012. A cylinder shaped object was seen over the city once again.
http://www.jerrypippin.com/UFO_A51triangle.jpg

WITNESS BUZZED BY A BLACK TRIANGLE IN VERMONT

Posted on January 18, 2012 by PFEIFER

WITNESS BUZZED BY A BLACK TRIANGE IN VERMONT

1-5-12 NORWICH VERMONT

While traveling South in the slow lane, on Interstate 91, at 4:50 am, I looked in my drivers side mirror and noticed a Black Triangular object with large yellow lights approximately 50ft. above and directly over the roof of a car, in the fast lane. After about 5 seconds I refocused my driving to the road in front of me as I was headed towards the breakdown lane.  I maneuvered my vehicle back into the slow lane and once again looked into the drivers side mirror and the object was gone. The vehicle behind me in the fast lane was still proceeding south behind me. The entire event lasted about 10 seconds. As I proceeded South, still looking through my drivers side window and passenger side window into the sky looking for the object, it didnt reappear! After I proceeded approximately a mile South on the interstate I saw what looked like a red shooting star with a streak in the sky directly in front of me lasting about 2 seconds. NOTE: The above image is a rendering.

Thanks to MUFON CMS system.

KEN PFEIFER WORLD UFO PHOTOS

WWW.WORLDUFOPHOTOS.ORG

WWW.WORLDUFOPHOTOSANDNEWS.ORG

WWW.MUFONNJNEWS.COM


http://www.openminds.tv/wp-content/uploads/dudley_dorito_2.jpghttp://otherworldmystery.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/TR-3B-sighting.png
http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/12/14/5c42ba26-25c5-4093-9ec0-7fbf934758e1.Large.jpg
http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2010/352/0/2/lockheed_xr_7a_thunderdart_by_bagera3005-d355tsv.png


Thursday, February 6, 2014

openSUSE 13.1

OMG! I have skipped openSUSE 12.3! But now I have openSUSE 13.1 so I haven't completely alienated openSUSE for Scientific Linux or Linux Mint. I might turn it into a Youtube video.  openSUSE 13.2 is out in November 2014!


openSUSE 13.1 has been released so it’s time for a review. I’ve always liked openSUSE, I started out with SUSE Linux years ago and it’s always had a special place in my heart. I’m glad it’s still around and doing so well these days. Whenever I install it, I’m reminded of where I got my start with Linux and I’m grateful that it was available back then.
This review covers the KDE version of openSUSE 13.1. However, you can also use GNOME as the default desktop environment. Both desktops are great, and work well in openSUSE. Ultimately it gets down to your personal preference, but I don’t think you can go wrong with either option.
If you aren’t familiar with what KDE has to offer, you can read an overview of KDE in openSUSE 13.1 that covers the advantages of the Plasma Desktop. Suffice to say that the combination of KDE 4.11 and openSUSE provides a powerful desktop operating system that is also elegant and pleasing in daily use.
openSUSE 13.1 Boot Menu
openSUSE 13.1 Boot Menu
What’s New in openSUSE 13.1 KDE
Here’s a sample of the new features in this release:
KDE
KDE Plasma Desktop is the default in openSUSE, and the 4.11 version of this Free Desktop is a long term maintained release. This release brings speed improvements in Desktop Search, file and window management, improved multi-monitor handling, brand new delayed mail sending feature and scam detection for KDE PIM and much more. Also new is deeper Android integration in the desktop and in the Amarok music player. See this great introduction to Plasma Desktop on openSUSE 13.1.
Stabilized
Much effort was put in testing openSUSE 13.1, with improvements to our automated openQA testing tool, a global bug fixing hackathon and more. The btrfs file system has received a serious workout and while not default, is considered stable for everyday usage. This release has been selected for Evergreen maintenance extending its life cycle to 3 years.
Networked
This release introduces the latest OpenStack Havana with almost 400 new features. Web server admins will appreciate the latest Apache, MySQL and MariaDB updates. Web developers benefit from an updated Ruby 2.0 on Rails 4 with improvements from core classes to better caching in the Rails framework and the latest php 5.4.2 comes with a build-in testing server. End users can now mount Amazon s3 buckets as local file system and use much improved Samba 4.1 with better windows domains support.
Evolved
openSUSE moves forward with AArch64, making openSUSE ready for development on the upcoming generation of 64bit ARM devices. 32bit ARM support has been heavily improved and a special Raspberry Pi build for openSUSE is available. This release also delivers GCC 4.8 with new error reporting abilities, the latest glibc supporting AArch64, C11 and Intel TSX Lock Elision, the new SDL2 and Qt 5.1, bringing QML and C++11 features to developers..
Polished
openSUSE 13.1 comes with much improved font hinting thanks to the new font engine in Freetype 2.5. YaST has been ported to Ruby, opening contribution up to a large number of skilled developers. In this release, ActiveDoc replaces doc.opensuse.org and the majority of packaged documents in openSUSE, lowering the barrier to contribution.
Faster
New is accelerated video with VDPAU support in MESA and an optimized version of glibc for 32bit systems. Linux 3.11 includes work on ‘page reclaim’, maintaining performance during disk operations.
Feature-full
Desktop users will appreciate the Android devices integration in the KDE file manager, in the shell and in music player Amarok. Artists have to try out the new Krita improvements with textured painting, greyscale masks & selections and more. GNOME Shell introduces a redesign of the system status bar and Header Bars in many applications, making better use of screen space. Enlightenment now also has an openSUSE theme.
Innovative
This release comes with a number of experimental technologies to try out. This includes preliminary Wayland support with Weston compositor in GNOME Shell and KDE Plasma Desktop as well as improved support for Ultra high-resolution in applications and shells. New is also the LightDM KDE greeter and a plasma NetworkManagement applet for testing.
System Requirements for openSUSE 13.1 KDE
Here’s what you’ll need to run openSUSE 13.1:
  • Pentium* III 500 MHz or higher processor (Pentium 4 2.4 GHz or higher or any AMD64 or Intel64 processor recommended)
  • Main memory: 1 GB physical RAM (2 GB recommended)
  • Hard disk: 3 GB available disk space for a minimal install, 5 GB available for a graphical desktop (more recommended)
  • Sound and graphics cards: supports most modern sound and graphics cards, 800 x 600 display resolution (1024 x 768 or higher recommended)
  • Booting from CD/DVD drive or USB-Stick for installation, or support for booting over network (you need to setup PXE by yourself, look also at Network install) or an existing installation of openSUSE, more information at Installation without CD
openSUSE 13.1 KDE Download
You can download openSUSE 13.1 KDE from the openSUSE download page. The file I downloaded weighed in at 4.57 GB. I also used the 64-bit version for this review, but you can download the 32-bit version if you prefer it.
While I opted for the DVD version that requires an install, you can also download the live versions of openSUSE 13.1 instead. That will let you run openSUSE 13.1 off the disc instead of having to do an install. I recommend doing this if you’ve never used openSUSE before, it will give you a taste of what it offers without having to do an actual install.
You can choose KDE or GNOME if you go for the live versions, see the links for each desktop environment on the downloads page for openSUSE 13.1.
If you’re a distrohopper then you might want to try it in a virtual machine via VirtualBox before running it on real hardware.
openSUSE 13.1 KDE Installation
Installing openSUSE 13.1 is not difficult though the installer is not quite as slick as the one in Ubuntu. My install took longer than an Ubuntu install but there was also more software included with it.
You can watch a slideshow once the install starts. I recommend checking out the slideshow if you are totally new to openSUSE, it’s a good way to start learning how to use it.
openSUSE 13.1 Install Mode
openSUSE 13.1 Install Mode
openSUSE 13.1 Install Partitioning
openSUSE 13.1 Install Partitioning
openSUSE 13.1 Install Desktop Selection
openSUSE 13.1 Install Desktop Selection
openSUSE 13.1 Install Repositories
openSUSE 13.1 Install Repositories
openSUSE 13.1 Install Settings
openSUSE 13.1 Install Settings
openSUSE 13.1 Install Slideshow
openSUSE 13.1 Install Slideshow
The openSUSE 13.1 KDE Desktop
The openSUSE 13.1 KDE desktop is quite attractive. The first things you notice are the darker color and the openSUSE mascot in green. The desktop contains icons for Firefox, the KInfoCenter, LibreOffice, Online Help and openSUSE.
Click the chameleon button on the panel to access application categories, system tools, utilities, desktop configuration, favorites, and to shut down your system. openSUSE 13.1 defaults to the sliding menus in KDE, but I prefer the classic menus instead. To switch to the classic menus, just right click the chameleon button on the panel and choose classic style.
openSUSE 13.1 Desktop
openSUSE 13.1 Desktop
openSUSE 13.1 Applications Menu
openSUSE 13.1 Applications Menu
openSUSE 13.1 YaST Control Center
openSUSE 13.1 YaST Control Center
Linux Software Included in openSUSE 13.1 KDE
Here’s a sample of the linux software included in openSUSE 13.1.
Games
KMahjongg
KReversi
KPatience
KMines
KSudoku
Graphics
GIMP
Hugin
digiKam
DNGConverter
Expoblending
Panorama
Photo Layouts
showFoto
AcquireImages
Skanite
Gwenview
Internet
Choqok
Konversation
Kopete
KMail
Firefox
Konqueror
Akregator
KTorrent
Multimedia
Amarok
AMZ Downloader
K3b
Kaffeine
KMix
KsCD
Office
KAddressBook
Kontact
KOrganizer
LibreOffice
Okular
Linux Software Management Tools in openSUSE 13.1 KDE
There are two ways to manage software in openSUSE 13.1, YaST2 and Apper. Unless you really need it, I recommend using Apper. The interface is a bit more intuitive and applications are broken down into category for easy browsing.
To install an application in Apper, just find it and click the Install button and then click Apply. To remove an application, just click the Remove button then click on Apply.
openSUSE 13.1 Apper Software Management
openSUSE 13.1 Apper Software Management
openSUSE 13.1 YaST 2 Software Management
openSUSE 13.1 YaST 2 Software Management
Problems & Headaches Found in openSUSE 13.1 KDE
openSUSE 13.1 ran extremely well for me, I saw no stability or speed problems with it. It seems that the developer claims about improving stability and speed have been borne out by its performance. However, if you’ve seen any problems then please post them in the comments below for the benefit of other readers. Thanks in advance.
In terms of criticism, I think there are two weak points in openSUSE 13.1.
The first is the installer. It’s not hard to use but it isn’t as streamlined as it could be. The installer in Ubuntu and Linux Mint seems more intuitive and simpler to me. openSUSE 13.1′s installer could use a rework that makes it more appealing and easier for folks that are new to this distro.
The second weak point is in software management. Apper is okay, but it lags behind the Ubuntu Software Center and Linux Mint’s Software Manager. Using YaST 2 for software management is fine for very experienced users, but it’s not something well suited to casual desktop users.
So I’d like to see some improvements on these two points. Some sort of app store type software management tool would be very welcome in openSUSE, along with a revamped installer that simplifies the process for folks new to Linux and openSUSE.
Neither of these things is a deal breaker by any means. openSUSE is a great desktop distribution, but there’s always room for improvement and I think addressing these two issues would make openSUSE even better than it is right now.
Where To Get Help for openSUSE 13.1 KDE
If you’re having problems, please post your questions in the comments below or register for the DLR forum. Other readers might be able to assist you. You might also want to check out the openSUSE forums or mailing list.
If you’re new to Linux, you might want to check out some of the books available about it at Amazon. You can learn quite a bit that you will probably find useful later on. You can also on laptops and tablets, desktops and monitors, components, and computer accessories.
Final Thoughts About openSUSE 13.1 KDE
openSUSE 13.1 takes an already fine desktop distribution and makes it even better. Ubuntu, Linux Mint and others have gotten more attention in recent years than openSUSE, but this release may very well change that. openSUSE 13.1 deserves to be included in any discussion of the top tier of desktop distributions.
I found myself really enjoying openSUSE 13.1, it’s well worth a download if you are in the market for a new desktop distro. If KDE and GNOME don’t appeal to you then you can build your own version of openSUSE or try one of the various derivatives of it.
If you are using Windows or OS X right now, openSUSE 13.1 is definitely a viable alternative. If you aren’t sure about using it, download one of the live versions of it and then run it off the disc first to see how you like it. My guess is that you will probably enjoy it once you get your feet wet with it.
openSUSE 13.1 is suitable for beginner, intermediate and advanced Linux users.
What’s your take on openSUSE 13.1 KDE? Tell me in the comments below.
Summary Table:
Product: openSUSE 13.1 KDE
Web Site: http://www.opensuse.org
Price: Free
Pros: Stability and speed improvements. Excellent KDE 4.11 integration. Android device integration in KDE. Updated versions of many different software applications.
Cons: Installer works well but is still not as elegant or streamlined as the one in Ubuntu and Linux Mint. Apper and YaST 2 are not as good in terms of intuitive software management as the Ubuntu Software Center or Linux Mint’s Software Manager.
Rating: 4/5

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Installed PC-BSD 10.0


I have stable Radeon R9 270x drivers for the PC-BSD 10.0.  Some RC releases had Radeon drivers, but some RC releases didn’t.  PC-BSD 10.0 had  RC1 – RC7 before RTM release.
New features for PC-BSD 10:
  • PC-BSD is now 25-30% faster.
  •  PC-BSD 10 dual boots with GRUB 2.0 so it can boot with latest Linux or Windows 8.1.
  •  ZFS version has been updated.
  •  MATE 1.6.1,
  • Cinnamon Desktop Environment,
  • KDE 4.10.5,
  •  XFCE 4.10
  • LXDE.
  • Works in Virtual Box and VMware Player fine.  Installed in 20 minutes!